My name's Lyssa, I'm a 20 year old ciswoman. My pronouns are she/her/herself.

My blog is basically just a clusterfuck of fandoms and human rights stuff. So, follow me if you like that stuff, I guess?

If you struggle with self-care and see this, stop what you’re doing

rosecoveredtardis:

  • Have you eaten in the last 4ish hours?
  • Have you had something to drink today?
  • Can you have something, even if just milk or water or cup’o’noodles or toast with something yummy on it, if you haven’t, please? 
  • If you have any injuries, can you please take care of them for me
  • Also please take any meds if you should and haven’t, yet?

Whatever you have or haven’t done today just know you’re super strong and I am so proud of you

Okay you can go back to blogging now~ <3

Jul 23rd at 8AM / via: highanxietiessupport / op: rosecoveredtardis / reblog / 47,156 notes
twospoonsofoatmealacouplanuts:

brandymallory:

So I took my friends to the museum in Winnipeg, and saw this.
Harry Potter Fandom, this ones for you. 

THAT’S WHY HARRY HAS TO TAKE GINNY UP TO WINNIPEG

View in High Quality →

twospoonsofoatmealacouplanuts:

brandymallory:

So I took my friends to the museum in Winnipeg, and saw this.

Harry Potter Fandom, this ones for you. 

THAT’S WHY HARRY HAS TO TAKE GINNY UP TO WINNIPEG

Jul 22nd at 11PM / via: sidekickjoey / op: brandymallory / reblog / 43,700 notes

Reminder:

an-agender-anarchist:

Bisexuality/Biromanticism is not:

  • The exclusive attraction to cisgender males and females.
  • The exclusive attraction to males and females.
  • The exclusive attraction to two genders.

Bisexuality/Biromanticism is:

  • The attraction to your gender and genders other than your own.

However:

  • Bi people can be attracted to two genders.
  • Bi people can be attracted to men and women.

Stop Saying:

  • Bisexuality/Biromanticism excludes binary trans people.
  • Bisexuality/Biromanticism excludes non-binary trans people.
  • Bisexuality/Biromanticism is “binarist”.

Quit it with the biphobia and transphobia, thank you.

(Source: droidism)

Jul 22nd at 11PM / via: darrekstolfer / op: droidism / reblog / 203 notes

viclopb:

brittbrittsantananights:

karmyarmycaptain:

skywarrior108:

megan-8:

How whipped are you? On a scale from 1 to Amy Raudenfeld

Quinn Fabray

image

Santana Lopez

image

there will never be any gif of anyone more whipped than Santana Lopez carrying ballot boxes with toy dinosaurs…

Yet she looks so fucking happy

Jul 22nd at 11PM / via: sidekickjoey / op: megan-8 / reblog / 1,814 notes
elasticitymudflap:

ericaisawesome56:

farfromgotham:

Fun fact time: many of my old acquaintances still make joking comments whenever they see me wearing pink, because as a child (and honestly pretty much right up to high school) I would refuse to associate with any pink objects. 
It wasn’t because I didn’t like pink, it was because since I appeared female I was supposed to/ it was immediately assumed that I did and therefore it pissed me the ever-loving fuck off. I was ashamed to like it, which is terrible because pink is an awesome color. But when you shove it down young girls throats it gets really old, really fast. 
Give the child the fucking rainbow, and if they pick pink, it’s not because they are female and/or effeminate, it’s because they like the color pink. 

THIS.

Gosh this

View in High Quality →

elasticitymudflap:

ericaisawesome56:

farfromgotham:

Fun fact time: many of my old acquaintances still make joking comments whenever they see me wearing pink, because as a child (and honestly pretty much right up to high school) I would refuse to associate with any pink objects. 

It wasn’t because I didn’t like pink, it was because since I appeared female I was supposed to/ it was immediately assumed that I did and therefore it pissed me the ever-loving fuck off. I was ashamed to like it, which is terrible because pink is an awesome color. But when you shove it down young girls throats it gets really old, really fast. 

Give the child the fucking rainbow, and if they pick pink, it’s not because they are female and/or effeminate, it’s because they like the color pink. 

THIS.

Gosh this

(Source: feminishblog)

Jul 22nd at 10PM / via: agent-timelord / op: feminishblog / reblog / 174,660 notes

nevillexharry:

exeters:

caputdraconis:

i wonder if luna needed the nargles and stuff to deal with the bullying. i wonder if it was just easier for her to think they stole her shoes rather than her peers are just being mean to her.

image

That’s why Harry was always nice to her. Because he knew. He knew what she was going through. It’s also why he forgave Snape in the end. Harry, even with all his celebrity, he never forgot what it felt like to be the boy in the cupboard, and he refused to ever treat someone the way he had been treated.

(Source: dissolvorays)

Jul 22nd at 10PM / via: guinevereweasley / op: dissolvorays / reblog / 26,817 notes

“You know those girls everyone loves to shit all over? The ones who really fucking love something? Those girls, man. They take all that energy, all that circulating fire in their veins, and instead of letting it destroy them, they choose to love, ferociously. Be it a band, or a book, or a series of films. They do it to keep themselves sane, and yet we mock them for it. Teenage girls find a buoy for themselves in the sea of emotional ruin, and they hold on tighter than anyone else.”

Segment of “Why I Fucking Love Teenage Girls (A Personal Essay from an Almost Adult)” (via bundleofstring)

(Source: jamesbagelshaw)

Jul 22nd at 10PM / via: captstevegrogers / op: jamesbagelshaw / reblog / 86,361 notes

caelas:

saying feminism is unnecessary because you don’t feel oppressed is like saying fire extinguishers are unnecessary because your house isn’t on fire

Jul 22nd at 8PM / via: stilesstilinskie / op: caelas / reblog / 67,497 notes

acciobenedictcumberbatch:

cedricdigory:

it kind of bothers me that after all this time people still dont understand how sorting works in harry potter

its not necessarily based on the characteristics you possess, its the ones you value, and that my friends is completely different. that is why the sorting hat considers your choice, otherwise why would he bother with your opinion

primary examples would be hermione, wormtail and lockhart

see also: neville

Jul 22nd at 8PM / via: margflower / op: cedricdigory / reblog / 84,085 notes

questiun:

Send me your name and I’ll make you a mini playlist that start with those letters

(Source: 6ee)

Jul 21st at 9PM / via: jbaggles / op: 6ee / reblog / 69,461 notes

eldermaslow:

agent-bartowski:

rumour:

THEY DELETED THE LILO & STITCH SANDWICH STACKER GAME FROM THE DISNEY WEBSITE

image

NO THEY DIDN’T IT’S RIGHT HERE REBLOG TO SAVE A LIFE

scalestails:

king-amphy:

JUST A LITTLE HISTORY FACT MY GRANDFATHER TOLD ME:
The reason this myth was a thing, was because back in the 30’s-50’s or so (I can’t remember the time)There was a parasite that was living in birds. It was hard to explain it to children, so they basically made up this myth so children wouldn’t touch the birds incase it carried the parasite.THE MORE YOU KNOW YEA?

I can’t stress this enough. The myth that a mother bird won’t take their baby back because you touched it ends up in horrible situations.
Example: child picks up baby bird. Parent thinks mom won’t take her back. They keep baby bird in a shoebox trying to feed it bird seed (that’s what birds eat right??) result: baby bird dies. It could have lived, had they left it alone.
The reality is if you see a baby bird on the ground it was either kicked out of the nest by stronger siblings OR it is a fledgling. Fledgling birds have some feathers on them and are able to walk/hop around. Parent birds leave them alone (sometimes for HOURS) to forage for food, coming back to feed/check on them. This only lasts a few weeks, then the bird is old enough to be on its own.
If you see a baby bird and it is walking/hopping around but doesn’t have its feathers grown in yet DO NOT TAKE IT HOME IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE RESCUED. At MOST if the bird is in a dangerous area (parking lot, middle of the road, etc.) move the bird to a NEARBY area free from danger. The parents will have no problem locating their chick, they expect then to roam anyway.
If the chick is small, mostly featherless, and cannot stand/walk on its own then you may attempt to return it to the nest, if the nest is within reach.

scalestails:

king-amphy:

JUST A LITTLE HISTORY FACT MY GRANDFATHER TOLD ME:

The reason this myth was a thing, was because back in the 30’s-50’s or so (I can’t remember the time)
There was a parasite that was living in birds. It was hard to explain it to children, so they basically made up this myth so children wouldn’t touch the birds incase it carried the parasite.
THE MORE YOU KNOW YEA?

I can’t stress this enough. The myth that a mother bird won’t take their baby back because you touched it ends up in horrible situations.

Example: child picks up baby bird. Parent thinks mom won’t take her back. They keep baby bird in a shoebox trying to feed it bird seed (that’s what birds eat right??) result: baby bird dies. It could have lived, had they left it alone.

The reality is if you see a baby bird on the ground it was either kicked out of the nest by stronger siblings OR it is a fledgling. Fledgling birds have some feathers on them and are able to walk/hop around. Parent birds leave them alone (sometimes for HOURS) to forage for food, coming back to feed/check on them. This only lasts a few weeks, then the bird is old enough to be on its own.

If you see a baby bird and it is walking/hopping around but doesn’t have its feathers grown in yet DO NOT TAKE IT HOME IT DOES NOT NEED TO BE RESCUED. At MOST if the bird is in a dangerous area (parking lot, middle of the road, etc.) move the bird to a NEARBY area free from danger. The parents will have no problem locating their chick, they expect then to roam anyway.

If the chick is small, mostly featherless, and cannot stand/walk on its own then you may attempt to return it to the nest, if the nest is within reach.

(Source: llbwwb)

Jul 21st at 4PM / via: veraamber / op: llbwwb / reblog / 61,715 notes

Lilo & Stitch: The Series intro

(Source: wdya)

Jul 21st at 2PM / via: starkid-nerdfighter / op: wdya / reblog / 1,882 notes